MethodWerx
All case studies

Testing as a Service for an ERP Transformation

A large operational services organisation was preparing for a major ERP transformation carrying significant integration, customer and release risk.  Our consultant designed a Testing as a Service model — one accountable Test Manager, a Test Lead, six Test Analysts and Executive oversight — spanning mobilisation, planning, SIT, UAT, regression, cutover, hypercare and formal capability transfer.

Client
Confidential Large Operational Services Organisation
Industry
Essential Services / Utilities
Engagement
Test Management Squad as a Service

Executive summary

A large operational services organisation was preparing for a major ERP transformation with significant integration, customer and release risk. The programme required an independent testing capability that could mobilise quickly, provide transparent quality controls and flex across planning, system integration testing, user acceptance testing, regression, cutover and hypercare.

Our consultant designed a Testing as a Service model centred on one accountable Test Manager, a Test Lead, six Test Analysts and Executive oversight. The proposed 12-month engagement followed a Ready, Deliver and Embed structure, linking mobilisation, test planning, execution, release assurance and capability transfer.

The model was designed to protect ERP transformation outcomes, create clear accountability for the quality story and formally transfer testing knowledge, artefacts and operating practices to the client before exit.

The challenge

  • Control ERP, integration and customer-impact risks across the programme
  • Mobilise a productive testing capability before formal commencement
  • Align capacity to planning, SIT, UAT, regression and cutover peaks
  • Create independent and transparent controls for release readiness
  • Establish one accountable owner for the test plan and quality story
  • Maintain continuity, executive oversight and proactive performance management
  • Retain knowledge, reusable assets and operating capability within the organisation
The organisation needed more than additional testing resources. It needed a coordinated service with clear accountability, flexible capacity and an evidenced transition to internal ownership.

The approach

01

Ready

Complete induction, project familiarisation, access verification, governance setup and the first 30-day priorities before Day 1.

02

Plan

Define the testing strategy, scope, estimates, traceability, governance and quality reporting for the billing programme.

03

Prepare

Review requirements, develop cases and scripts, and verify environment and data readiness.

04

Execute & release

Coordinate SIT and regression, defect control, evidence, reporting, exit assessment, cutover validation and hypercare assurance.

05

Embed

Transfer strategies, plans, procedures, scripts, evidence and decisions through shadowing, documentation, coaching and formal sign-off.

The offering

The squad

  • One Test Manager and three Test Analysts as a dedicated testing capability
  • Head of Consulting accountability for squad performance and escalation
  • Backfill, delivery oversight and a consistent quality narrative

Test governance

  • Strategy, planning, RAID, reporting and quality controls
  • Entry criteria and formal exit assessment for each release
  • Support across mobilisation, planning, preparation, execution, release and embed

Day 1 readiness gate

  • Client induction: policies, security, safety and ways of working
  • Project familiarisation: billing objectives, scope, vendors, architecture and risks
  • Access and environments: identity, devices, repositories, tools and data verified
  • Test mobilisation: governance, cadence, RAID and first 30-day priorities agreed

Capability transfer

  • Participation evidence, accepted artefacts and role-based coaching
  • Reverse shadowing and ownership sign-off
  • Formal acceptance pack: document register, unresolved-item register, ownership matrix and completion sign-off

Flexible capacity

  • Capability aligned to delivery peaks and specialist needs
  • Scale up or down under agreed notice and rate rules

Commercial models

  • Fixed squad subscription for predictable programmes
  • Flexible capacity squad that scales with lifecycle demand
  • Outcome-based squad managed against agreed deliverables and quality outcomes

The value of Testing as a Service

Day 1

Rapid readiness — critical mobilisation completed before Day 1

Assured

Independent quality controls protecting billing and release outcomes

Executive

Senior accountability for performance and escalation

Flexible

Capacity adapted to delivery peaks and specialist needs

IP kept

Knowledge and reusable assets transferred to the organisation

1 owner

One Test Manager owning the plan and quality story

Business impact

Programme leadership

  • A clear quality owner for the billing transformation
  • Independent release evidence supporting go/no-go decisions
  • Proactive management of squad performance and escalation

Delivery teams

  • Testing capacity aligned to SIT, UAT, regression and cutover peaks
  • Consistent defect control, evidence and reporting
  • Continuity through backfill and delivery oversight

The organisation

  • Testing knowledge, artefacts and operating practices retained in-house
  • Reusable assets and a documented ownership matrix
  • A repeatable model for future releases
“The squad model provides the programme a clear quality owner, independent release evidence and the flexibility to respond to delivery peaks. The structured transfer approach also ensured that testing knowledge and reusable assets remained within the organisation.”

Why MethodWerx

MethodWerx delivers Testing as a Service through accountable squads that combine test leadership, delivery capacity, governance, executive oversight and capability transfer:

  • Test management as a service
  • Test strategy, planning and traceability
  • SIT, UAT and regression coordination
  • Defect, release and cutover assurance
  • Flexible capacity and continuity
  • Knowledge, artefact and capability transfer

The model protects critical release outcomes while leaving the organisation with the people, practices and assets to run testing itself.

Start the conversation

Next case study

Recovering Five Failing Projects for a Big 4 Bank

Read more

Let’s shape what’s next.

If you have significant change to deliver — not just advice to receive — we’d welcome a conversation.

Start a conversation